June 11, 2006

On Probligo

Some of Probligo's comments, just to clarify his position since he won't do it himself.

Arvin,

Truly the fools are those who put such a weak candidate up against Bush at the last election.

Truly the fools are those milions who believe that Bush is right.

Truly the fools are those who voted George Bush another four years in office.

Truly the fools are those in power in the US who do nothing to rein in the idiocy of their administration.
# posted by The probligo : February 14, 2005 9:59 PM


To be continued

Update

At 1:55 AM, June 10, 2006, The probligo said...

Good grief!! What a long, tedious, and self-gratuitous string of confused thinking, misinterpretation and shouting past each other.

To show how "important" the US will consider Haditha and the war crimes committed there (and those committed elsewhere in Iraq that we will NOT hear about)...

1. Any of the Marines responsible for Haditha murders who return to the US alive will be charged with the murder of those civilians.

2. It will take at least two years, likely as long as four years, for them to appear in Court as there will be delays "for the gathering of evidence" and "while the defendants recover from PTSD".

3. When they do eventually appear in US Military Court, they will be committed on the grounds that they were suffering from PTSD at the time of the offences owing to the fact that they had narrowly escaped being killed by an IED.

4. If any are found guilty (and that is a very long shot) they will probably be sentenced to another season in Iraq.

At 9:19 AM, June 10, 2006, Ymarsakar said...

I don't consider Probligo, who can't even understand a need to self-arm for self-defense, a person that qualifies to judge anything relating to war including violations of the Military Code.

At 8:55 PM, June 10, 2006, The probligo said...

No, dear Y, as I keep saying to you, and as you are obviously totally unable to understand or perceive -

Where I live, where confude lives, there is no need to carry arms for protection.

When you are able to wrap your four neurons around that idea perhaps you might be able to think a little more clearly about how the rest of the world see you and your kind.

Neo, sorry. I did not intend to include you in this but Y, his stupidity, his racism, his need for penile compensation with big-bore weapons, has gotten to me totally. He hasn't the guts to reply to my post on my site. He had to take his reply away to his own site - probably because he feared I might delete it...

I feel sorry for those who live in places that are so insecure, so unsafe, that carrying arms for defence as a matter of course is a neccessity. That is not how I live my life. It should not be neccessary to live like that in any country that promotes freedom.

I have freedom and no need for a gun.

Why does Y need a gun? Because he lives in fear, not freedom.

At 11:43 PM, June 10, 2006, Ymarsakar said...

I've said this recently toConfud in a more recent thread at Neo. Handguns and rifles rank a mere 3 on an absolute scale of 1 to 10.

The logic is simple, as it is demanding of attention. Racism isn't the difference between someone disbelieving he needs weapons and someone that believes weapons are useful. And that's it.

He had to take his reply away to his own site - probably because he feared I might delete it...

You wrote your reply on your blog instead of here at neo's, so I wrote my reply at my own blog instead of here. That's it, simple logic.

Guts is part of weapons making, but in this case it is not relevant.

Probligo has described being assaulted twice or thrice. I have never been assaulted by anyone, with or without a weapon, although there was a burglary once. The difference between the philosophy of warriors and those who live by the sword, to other folks, is not about what is necessary. It is about what is virtuous, or in this case, what is good for human beings.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home